crossword

This phrase describes a specific type of clue found in the New York Times crossword puzzle. It signals that the answer is a consequence or effect of some action or premise. For instance, a clue like “Consequence of overwatering” might lead to the answer “ROOTROT.” These clues often rely on logic and causal relationships to guide solvers toward the correct solution.

Understanding this clue type is crucial for successfully completing the New York Times crossword. It encourages solvers to think critically and consider cause-and-effect relationships, adding a layer of complexity beyond simple vocabulary recall. This focus on logical deduction contributes to the puzzle’s enduring popularity and reputation as a challenging mental exercise. The use of such clues has likely been a consistent feature throughout the crossword’s history, reflecting the puzzle’s emphasis on both knowledge and reasoning.

Read more

In the context of crossword puzzles, a clue implying a consequential relationship signifies that the answer is a word or phrase representing an effect or outcome. For instance, the clue “Consequence of rain” might lead to the answer “PUDDLE” or “FLOOD.” This type of clue relies on understanding cause-and-effect relationships and often requires lateral thinking.

Such clues contribute to the challenge and enjoyment of crossword puzzles by requiring solvers to think beyond simple definitions. They encourage a deeper level of engagement with language and concepts, moving beyond rote memorization to deductive reasoning. Historically, cryptic crosswords have frequently employed this type of clue, adding a layer of complexity and wordplay to the puzzle-solving experience.

Read more